Aluminum Vs Copper Bus Duct

Go to pow r flex busway.

Aluminum vs copper bus duct.

Aluminum bus bar conductivity is dependent on the alloy and temper. Bus duct comparison of the two technologies bus duct is defined in the nec 368 2 as a grounded metal enclosure containing factory mounted bare or insulated conductors which are usually copper or aluminum bars rods or tubes. Non segregated phase bus duct. It is an alternative means of conducting electricity to power cables or cable bus.

In fact when comparing the two materials aluminum bus bar is twice as conductive as copper. Aluminium is more cheaper than copper and in case of bus bar there is no compulsion of space so we can also use more flatter or comparatively bigger bus bar rather than using a copper smaller and less flattered bus bar. Bus bars or conductors conduct electricity. Originally a busway consisted of bare copper conductors supported on inorganic.

In cost comparisons between 3 200a copper versus 4 000a aluminium there is a saving of 23. Eaton s comprehensive portfolio of busway solutions offers endless possibilities for meeting today s ever changing power requirements. Even going to a higher rated aluminium trunking over copper it still offers financial savings. Go to pow r way iii busway.

In electric power distribution a bus duct also called busway is a sheet metal duct or also cast resin insulated containing either copper or aluminium busbars for the purpose of conducting a substantial current of electricity. Aluminum bus bar conductivity can be reduced depending on its alloying agents. Predominant aluminum bus bar material being utilized and is stronger than 1350 al because it has been hardened by heat treatment but it only has 56 the conductivity of copper. This increases to 35 when comparing a 3 200a rating like for like in material.